chr20-35433484-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000557.5(GDF5):​c.*425T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0731 in 338,590 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,562 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.057 ( 369 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.087 ( 1193 hom. )

Consequence

GDF5
NM_000557.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.243
Variant links:
Genes affected
GDF5 (HGNC:4220): (growth differentiation factor 5) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates the development of numerous tissue and cell types, including cartilage, joints, brown fat, teeth, and the growth of neuronal axons and dendrites. Mutations in this gene are associated with acromesomelic dysplasia, brachydactyly, chondrodysplasia, multiple synostoses syndrome, proximal symphalangism, and susceptibility to osteoarthritis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
GDF5-AS1 (HGNC:33435): (GDF5 antisense RNA 1) Predicted to be located in mitochondrion. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 20-35433484-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-35433484-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 338310.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.2 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GDF5NM_000557.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/2 ENST00000374369.8
GDF5-AS1NR_161326.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.135+321A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
GDF5NM_001319138.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 4/4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GDF5ENST00000374369.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/21 NM_000557.5 P1
GDF5ENST00000374372.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 4/41 P1
GDF5-AS1ENST00000374375.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.135+321A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0565
AC:
8601
AN:
152142
Hom.:
360
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0354
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0706
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.173
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.210
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0617
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0478
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0526
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0559
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0867
AC:
16148
AN:
186330
Hom.:
1193
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.100
AC XY:
10136
AN XY:
101282
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0328
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0311
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0758
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.173
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.200
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0643
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0529
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0670
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0566
AC:
8619
AN:
152260
Hom.:
369
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0596
AC XY:
4435
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0354
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0383
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0706
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.173
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.211
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0617
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0526
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0638
Alfa
AF:
0.0493
Hom.:
67
Bravo
AF:
0.0500
Asia WGS
AF:
0.241
AC:
838
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 12, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19565498) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Grebe syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Multiple synostoses syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Brachydactyly Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Acromesomelic dysplasia 2B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Acromesomelic dysplasia 2C, Hunter-Thompson type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.12
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56366915; hg19: chr20-34021282; API