20-35433522-A-G

Variant names:

• chr20-35433522-A-G
• rs553655935
• NM_000557.5:c.*387T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2 BP4_Strong BP6_Moderate BS1

The NM_000557.5(GDF5):​c.*387T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000631 in 348,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: GDF5 NM_000557.5 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0270

Genes affected

GDF5 (HGNC:4220): (growth differentiation factor 5) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates the development of numerous tissue and cell types, including cartilage, joints, brown fat, teeth, and the growth of neuronal axons and dendrites. Mutations in this gene are associated with acromesomelic dysplasia, brachydactyly, chondrodysplasia, multiple synostoses syndrome, proximal symphalangism, and susceptibility to osteoarthritis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

GDF5-AS1 (HGNC:33435): (GDF5 antisense RNA 1) Predicted to be located in mitochondrion. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
• BP6: Variant 20-35433522-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-35433522-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 338312.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000591 (9/152252) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00155 (8/5168). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00077. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GDF5	NM_000557.5	c.*387T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000374369.8	NP_000548.2
GDF5	NM_001319138.2	c.*387T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4		NP_001306067.1
GDF5-AS1	NR_161326.1	n.136-330A>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GDF5	ENST00000374369	c.*387T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 2	1	NM_000557.5	ENSP00000363489.3
GDF5	ENST00000374372	c.*387T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1		ENSP00000363492.1
GDF5-AS1	ENST00000374375.1	n.136-330A>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9 AN: 152134 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00154

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000663 AC: 13 AN: 196148 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000565 AC XY: 6 AN XY: 106228

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000998

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00109

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000309

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9 AN: 152252 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6 AN XY: 74448

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00155

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000214 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000642

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Grebe syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Multiple synostoses syndrome 2 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Brachydactyly Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acromesomelic dysplasia 2B Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Acromesomelic dysplasia 2C, Hunter-Thompson type Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.82
CADD	Benign	9.0
DANN	Benign	0.77

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs553655935; hg19: chr20-34021320;