chr20-35433522-A-G

Position:

chr20-35433522-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1

The NM_000557.5(GDF5):c.*387T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000631 in 348,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GDF5
NM_000557.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0270

Variant links:

Genes affected

GDF5 (HGNC:4220): (growth differentiation factor 5) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates the development of numerous tissue and cell types, including cartilage, joints, brown fat, teeth, and the growth of neuronal axons and dendrites. Mutations in this gene are associated with acromesomelic dysplasia, brachydactyly, chondrodysplasia, multiple synostoses syndrome, proximal symphalangism, and susceptibility to osteoarthritis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

GDF5 links:

GDF5-AS1 (HGNC:33435): (GDF5 antisense RNA 1) Predicted to be located in mitochondrion. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

GDF5-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 20-35433522-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-35433522-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 338312.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000591 (9/152252) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00155 (8/5168). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00077. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE
GDF5	NM_000557.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.*387T>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2	ENST00000374369.8
GDF5-AS1	NR_161326.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.136-330A>G	intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
GDF5	NM_001319138.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.*387T>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	4/4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris
GDF5	ENST00000374369.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.*387T>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2	1	NM_000557.5	P1
GDF5	ENST00000374372.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.*387T>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	4/4	1		P1
GDF5-AS1	ENST00000374375.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.136-330A>G	intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000663

AC:

AN:

196148

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000565

AC XY:

AN XY:

106228

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000998

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000309

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000806

AC XY:

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00155

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000214

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Grebe syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Multiple synostoses syndrome 2

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Brachydactyly

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acromesomelic dysplasia 2B

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

Acromesomelic dysplasia 2C, Hunter-Thompson type

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

9.0

DANN

Benign

0.77

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over