20-36892872-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):c.*60A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00543 in 1,600,802 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0045 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0055 ( 31 hom. )
Consequence
SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.968
Genes affected
SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
TLDC2 (HGNC:16112): (TBC/LysM-associated domain containing 2) Predicted to be involved in response to oxidative stress. Predicted to act upstream of or within negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced neuron death. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).
BP6
Variant 20-36892872-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-36892872-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 338338.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00447 (681/152310) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00651 (443/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00601. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 361 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMHD1 | NM_015474.4 | c.*60A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000646673.2 | ||
TLDC2 | NM_080628.3 | c.*28T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 7/7 | ENST00000217320.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLDC2 | ENST00000217320.8 | c.*28T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 7/7 | 1 | NM_080628.3 | P1 | ||
SAMHD1 | ENST00000646673.2 | c.*60A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 16/16 | NM_015474.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00448 AC: 682AN: 152192Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
682
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00516 AC: 1285AN: 249026Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00523 AC XY: 705AN XY: 134804
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1285
AN:
249026
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
705
AN XY:
134804
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00553 AC: 8016AN: 1448492Hom.: 31 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.00537 AC XY: 3871AN XY: 721522
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
8016
AN:
1448492
Hom.:
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
AC XY:
3871
AN XY:
721522
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00447 AC: 681AN: 152310Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00485 AC XY: 361AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
681
AN:
152310
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
361
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Chilblain lupus 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2023 | SAMHD1: BS2; TLDC2: BS2 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at