chr20-36892872-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):​c.*60A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00543 in 1,600,802 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0045 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0055 ( 31 hom. )

Consequence

SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.968
Variant links:
Genes affected
SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
TLDC2 (HGNC:16112): (TBC/LysM-associated domain containing 2) Predicted to be involved in response to oxidative stress. Predicted to act upstream of or within negative regulation of oxidative stress-induced neuron death. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).
BP6
Variant 20-36892872-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-36892872-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 338338.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00447 (681/152310) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00651 (443/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00601. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 361 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SAMHD1NM_015474.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.*60A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 16/16 ENST00000646673.2
TLDC2NM_080628.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.*28T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 7/7 ENST00000217320.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TLDC2ENST00000217320.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.*28T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 7/71 NM_080628.3 P1
SAMHD1ENST00000646673.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*60A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 16/16 NM_015474.4 P1Q9Y3Z3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00448
AC:
682
AN:
152192
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00653
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00516
AC:
1285
AN:
249026
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00523
AC XY:
705
AN XY:
134804
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00140
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00763
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00736
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00553
AC:
8016
AN:
1448492
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.00537
AC XY:
3871
AN XY:
721522
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000844
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000384
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0145
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00619
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00445
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00447
AC:
681
AN:
152310
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00485
AC XY:
361
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00651
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00513
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00316
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00458
EpiControl
AF:
0.00480

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chilblain lupus 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2023SAMHD1: BS2; TLDC2: BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.93
CADD
Benign
0.35
DANN
Benign
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45595032; hg19: chr20-35521275; API