20-46021836-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 3P and 5B. PM2PP2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001134771.2(SLC12A5):c.71G>A(p.Arg24His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000196 in 1,533,422 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001134771.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC12A5 | NM_001134771.2 | c.71G>A | p.Arg24His | missense_variant | 1/26 | NP_001128243.1 | ||
SLC12A5-AS1 | NR_147699.1 | n.238C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC12A5 | ENST00000454036.6 | c.71G>A | p.Arg24His | missense_variant | 1/26 | 5 | ENSP00000387694.1 | |||
SLC12A5 | ENST00000626701.1 | c.71G>A | p.Arg24His | missense_variant | 1/3 | 3 | ENSP00000487372.1 | |||
SLC12A5 | ENST00000628272.1 | c.71G>A | p.Arg24His | missense_variant | 1/2 | 3 | ENSP00000486382.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000210 AC: 29AN: 1381202Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000337 AC XY: 23AN XY: 681756
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74370
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at