20-63659457-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001283009.2(RTEL1):c.55A>G(p.Lys19Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K19R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001283009.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTEL1 | NM_001283009.2 | c.55A>G | p.Lys19Glu | missense_variant | 2/35 | ENST00000360203.11 | |
RTEL1-TNFRSF6B | NR_037882.1 | n.882A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/38 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTEL1 | ENST00000360203.11 | c.55A>G | p.Lys19Glu | missense_variant | 2/35 | 5 | NM_001283009.2 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 14, 2022 | The c.55A>G (p.K19E) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 1) of the RTEL1 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 55, causing the lysine (K) at amino acid position 19 to be replaced by a glutamic acid (E). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at