21-37188565-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001330683.2(TTC3):āc.4994C>Gā(p.Ala1665Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000281 in 1,613,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001330683.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC3 | NM_001330683.2 | c.4994C>G | p.Ala1665Gly | missense_variant | 39/46 | ENST00000418766.6 | NP_001317612.1 | |
TTC3-AS1 | NR_046651.1 | n.198G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC3 | ENST00000418766.6 | c.4994C>G | p.Ala1665Gly | missense_variant | 39/46 | 5 | NM_001330683.2 | ENSP00000403943 | P2 | |
TTC3-AS1 | ENST00000424733.1 | n.198G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000617 AC: 155AN: 251394Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000640 AC XY: 87AN XY: 135860
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000285 AC: 417AN: 1461774Hom.: 3 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000308 AC XY: 224AN XY: 727190
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000237 AC: 36AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000229 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 28, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at