21-46137036-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_206965.2(FTCD):āc.1577A>Gā(p.Lys526Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000471 in 1,613,616 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206965.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCD | NM_206965.2 | c.1577A>G | p.Lys526Arg | missense_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000397746.8 | NP_996848.1 | |
FTCD | NM_006657.3 | c.1577A>G | p.Lys526Arg | missense_variant | 14/15 | NP_006648.1 | ||
FTCD | NM_001320412.2 | c.1557A>G | p.Gln519Gln | synonymous_variant | 14/15 | NP_001307341.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCD | ENST00000397746.8 | c.1577A>G | p.Lys526Arg | missense_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_206965.2 | ENSP00000380854.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000201 AC: 5AN: 248212Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000297 AC XY: 4AN XY: 134730
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000513 AC: 75AN: 1461376Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.0000523 AC XY: 38AN XY: 726984
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at