22-24495429-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The ENST00000326010.10(UPB1):āc.26T>Cā(p.Leu9Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000632 in 1,613,420 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L9L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000326010.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPB1 | NM_016327.3 | c.26T>C | p.Leu9Pro | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000326010.10 | NP_057411.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPB1 | ENST00000326010.10 | c.26T>C | p.Leu9Pro | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_016327.3 | ENSP00000324343 | P1 | |
UPB1 | ENST00000382760.2 | c.26T>C | p.Leu9Pro | missense_variant | 1/4 | 5 | ENSP00000372208 | |||
UPB1 | ENST00000415388.5 | c.26T>C | p.Leu9Pro | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1/9 | 5 | ENSP00000400684 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000560 AC: 14AN: 250136Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000369 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135366
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000636 AC: 93AN: 1461246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000674 AC XY: 49AN XY: 726966
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Deficiency of beta-ureidopropionase Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 23, 2022 | This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 9 of the UPB1 protein (p.Leu9Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs755104394, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with UPB1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 340928). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C25"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at