22-25201421-G-A

Position:

chr22-25201421-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4BS1_Supporting

The NM_004076.5(CRYBB3):c.25G>A(p.Glu9Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000273 in 1,613,252 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CRYBB3
NM_004076.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.47

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRYBB3 (HGNC:2400): (crystallin beta B3) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Beta-crystallins, the most heterogeneous, differ by the presence of the C-terminal extension (present in the basic group, none in the acidic group). Beta-crystallins form aggregates of different sizes and are able to self-associate to form dimers or to form heterodimers with other beta-crystallins. This gene, a beta basic group member, is part of a gene cluster with beta-A4, beta-B1, and beta-B2. Mutations in this gene result in cataract congenital nuclear autosomal recessive type 2. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

CRYBB3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.

PM1

In a chain Beta-crystallin B3 (size 210) in uniprot entity CRBB3_HUMAN there are 8 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (89%) in NM_004076.5

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.41294718).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000986 (15/152090) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000266 (11/41402). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000149. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 7 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRYBB3	NM_004076.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.25G>A	p.Glu9Lys	missense_variant	2/6	ENST00000215855.7	NP_004067.1	P26998
CRYBB3	XM_047441147.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.25G>A	p.Glu9Lys	missense_variant	1/5		XP_047297103.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRYBB3	ENST00000215855.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.25G>A	p.Glu9Lys	missense_variant	2/6	1	NM_004076.5	ENSP00000215855.2		P26998
CRYBB3	ENST00000404334.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.25G>A	p.Glu9Lys	missense_variant	2/5	3		ENSP00000386123.1		B1AHR5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000986

AC:

AN:

152090

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000266

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000159

AC:

AN:

251398

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000147

AC XY:

AN XY:

135896

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000198

AC:

AN:

1461162

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000193

AC XY:

AN XY:

726906

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000162

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000497

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000986

AC:

AN:

152090

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000942

AC XY:

AN XY:

74302

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000266

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000444

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000907

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 22 multiple types

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.17

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.13

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.19

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.025

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.27

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.22

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.93

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.044

MetaRNN

Benign

0.41

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.81

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.2

M;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.62

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.91

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.31

Sift

Benign

0.16

T;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.69

T;T

Polyphen

0.22

B;.

Vest4

0.62

MVP

0.60

MPC

0.26

ClinPred

0.23

GERP RS

2.6

Varity_R

0.084

gMVP

0.46

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over