22-33277139-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_133642.5(LARGE1):​c.1994G>A​(p.Arg665His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00929 in 1,614,246 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 101 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R665C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0060 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0096 ( 96 hom. )

Consequence

LARGE1
NM_133642.5 missense

Scores

1
9
7

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.91

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LARGE1 (HGNC:6511): (LARGE xylosyl- and glucuronyltransferase 1) This gene encodes a member of the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase gene family. It encodes a glycosyltransferase which participates in glycosylation of alpha-dystroglycan, and may carry out the synthesis of glycoprotein and glycosphingolipid sugar chains. It may also be involved in the addition of a repeated disaccharide unit. The protein encoded by this gene is the glycotransferase that adds the final xylose and glucuronic acid to alpha-dystroglycan and thereby allows alpha-dystroglycan to bind ligands including laminin 211 and neurexin. Mutations in this gene cause several forms of congenital muscular dystrophy characterized by cognitive disability and abnormal glycosylation of alpha-dystroglycan. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants that encode the same protein. [provided by RefSeq, May 2018]
LARGE1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy type B6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • congenital muscular dystrophy with intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy, type A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008549035).
BP6
Variant 22-33277139-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-33277139-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95171.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00597 (910/152376) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00992 (675/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0093. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 386 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LARGE1NM_133642.5 linkc.1994G>A p.Arg665His missense_variant Exon 14 of 15 ENST00000397394.8 NP_598397.1 O95461-1X5DR28

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LARGE1ENST00000397394.8 linkc.1994G>A p.Arg665His missense_variant Exon 14 of 15 5 NM_133642.5 ENSP00000380549.2 O95461-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00598
AC:
910
AN:
152258
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0647
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00992
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00527
AC:
1324
AN:
251412
AF XY:
0.00553
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00280
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00915
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00456
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00964
AC:
14086
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
96
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00932
AC XY:
6775
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00188
AC:
63
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00293
AC:
131
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000115
AC:
3
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00373
AC:
322
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00198
AC:
106
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00277
AC:
16
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0117
AC:
13063
AN:
1111990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00632
AC:
382
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.464
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
795
1590
2385
3180
3975
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
528
1056
1584
2112
2640
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00597
AC:
910
AN:
152376
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00518
AC XY:
386
AN XY:
74524
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
95
AN:
41594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00215
AC:
33
AN:
15314
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00290
AC:
14
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00235
AC:
25
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00992
AC:
675
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
8
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
46
91
137
182
228
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00817
Hom.:
38
Bravo
AF:
0.00615
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0146
AC:
54
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0132
AC:
51
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00204
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0108
AC:
93
ExAC
AF:
0.00503
AC:
611
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00840
EpiControl
AF:
0.00883

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Jul 11, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 22, 2014
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 15, 2012
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 03, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

LARGE1: BS1, BS2 -

Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy type B6 Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with brain and eye anomalies), type A6 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.76
D;D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.43
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.38
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
.;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0085
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.79
T
PhyloP100
2.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.4
D;D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D
Vest4
0.49
MVP
0.48
MPC
1.6
ClinPred
0.023
T
GERP RS
3.4
Varity_R
0.41
gMVP
0.71
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1046166; hg19: chr22-33673125; API