22-39521955-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_182810.3(ATF4):c.409A>T(p.Thr137Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00597 in 1,605,392 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182810.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATF4 | NM_182810.3 | c.409A>T | p.Thr137Ser | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000674920.3 | NP_877962.1 | |
ATF4 | NM_001675.4 | c.409A>T | p.Thr137Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 | NP_001666.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATF4 | ENST00000674920.3 | c.409A>T | p.Thr137Ser | missense_variant | 3/3 | NM_182810.3 | ENSP00000501863 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00425 AC: 637AN: 149748Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00481 AC: 1207AN: 251130Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00476 AC XY: 646AN XY: 135744
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00615 AC: 8947AN: 1455526Hom.: 44 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00615 AC XY: 4454AN XY: 724288
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00426 AC: 639AN: 149866Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00394 AC XY: 288AN XY: 73086
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at