3-114380238-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 1P and 8B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001348800.3(ZBTB20):c.178G>A(p.Ala60Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000911 in 1,536,552 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001348800.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBTB20 | NM_001348800.3 | c.178G>A | p.Ala60Thr | missense_variant | 10/12 | ENST00000675478.1 | NP_001335729.1 | |
ZBTB20-AS1 | NR_038993.1 | n.979+4402C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBTB20 | ENST00000675478.1 | c.178G>A | p.Ala60Thr | missense_variant | 10/12 | NM_001348800.3 | ENSP00000501561 | A2 | ||
ZBTB20-AS1 | ENST00000659395.1 | n.564-7185C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000209 AC: 3AN: 143804Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 2AN XY: 76716
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000722 AC: 10AN: 1384470Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000878 AC XY: 6AN XY: 683126
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74292
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 10, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at