3-132686308-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BS1_Supporting
The NM_153240.5(NPHP3):c.3281G>A(p.Arg1094Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000921 in 1,613,696 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00054 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00096 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NPHP3
NM_153240.5 missense
NM_153240.5 missense
Scores
1
9
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.50
Genes affected
NPHP3 (HGNC:7907): (nephrocystin 3) This gene encodes a protein containing a coiled-coil (CC) domain, a tubulin-tyrosine ligase (TTL) domain, and a tetratrico peptide repeat (TPR) domain. The encoded protein interacts with nephrocystin, it is required for normal ciliary development, and it functions in renal tubular development. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 3, and also with renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, and Meckel syndrome type 7. Naturally occurring read-through transcripts exist between this gene and the downstream ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
NPHP3-ACAD11 (HGNC:48351): (NPHP3-ACAD11 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring NPHP3 (nephronophthisis 3, adolescent) and ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) genes on chromosome 3. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000539 (82/152168) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00101 (69/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000821. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 25 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHP3 | NM_153240.5 | c.3281G>A | p.Arg1094Gln | missense_variant | 23/27 | ENST00000337331.10 | NP_694972.3 | |
NPHP3-ACAD11 | NR_037804.1 | n.3287G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 22/45 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHP3 | ENST00000337331.10 | c.3281G>A | p.Arg1094Gln | missense_variant | 23/27 | 1 | NM_153240.5 | ENSP00000338766.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000539 AC: 82AN: 152048Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
82
AN:
152048
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000493 AC: 124AN: 251476Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000530 AC XY: 72AN XY: 135910
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
124
AN:
251476
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
135910
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000961 AC: 1405AN: 1461528Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000872 AC XY: 634AN XY: 727104
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1405
AN:
1461528
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
634
AN XY:
727104
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000539 AC: 82AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000336 AC XY: 25AN XY: 74372
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
82
AN:
152168
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74372
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
10
ExAC
AF:
AC:
52
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The NPHP3 p.Arg1094Gln variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs146890274) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago and EGL Genetics). The variant was identified in control databases in 143 of 282850 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0005056 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 125 of 129172 chromosomes (freq: 0.000968), Other in 3 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.000415), Latino in 6 of 35436 chromosomes (freq: 0.000169), African in 4 of 24962 chromosomes (freq: 0.00016), European (Finnish) in 4 of 25114 chromosomes (freq: 0.000159) and South Asian in 1 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000033), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The p.Arg1094 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and two of four in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 22, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 05, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 19, 2023 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; In silico analysis is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 11, 2015 | - - |
Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
NPHP3-related Meckel-like syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Nephronophthisis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 25, 2022 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1094 of the NPHP3 protein (p.Arg1094Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs146890274, gnomAD 0.1%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NPHP3-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 195784). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on NPHP3 protein function. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Nephronophthisis 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
P
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DL_spliceai
Position offset: -48
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at