3-14158408-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004628.5(XPC):​c.1475G>A​(p.Arg492His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0504 in 1,613,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,337 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 167 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.052 ( 2170 hom. )

Consequence

XPC
NM_004628.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.190
Variant links:
Genes affected
XPC (HGNC:12816): (XPC complex subunit, DNA damage recognition and repair factor) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the XPC complex, which plays an important role in the early steps of global genome nucleotide excision repair (NER). The encoded protein is important for damage sensing and DNA binding, and shows a preference for single-stranded DNA. Mutations in this gene or some other NER components can result in Xeroderma pigmentosum, a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by increased sensitivity to sunlight with the development of carcinomas at an early age. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
XPC-AS1 (HGNC:55014): (XPC antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.001995474).
BP6
Variant 3-14158408-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-14158408-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135489.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0569 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
XPCNM_004628.5 linkc.1475G>A p.Arg492His missense_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENST00000285021.12 NP_004619.3 Q01831-1X5DRB1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
XPCENST00000285021.12 linkc.1475G>A p.Arg492His missense_variant Exon 9 of 16 1 NM_004628.5 ENSP00000285021.8 Q01831-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0397
AC:
6037
AN:
152088
Hom.:
167
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0459
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0763
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0358
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0295
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0584
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0612
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0421
AC:
10493
AN:
249056
Hom.:
305
AF XY:
0.0435
AC XY:
5880
AN XY:
135130
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0100
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0313
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0687
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0272
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0572
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0473
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0515
AC:
75295
AN:
1461660
Hom.:
2170
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0513
AC XY:
37310
AN XY:
727110
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00887
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0327
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0679
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0402
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0284
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0572
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0397
AC:
6036
AN:
152206
Hom.:
167
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0395
AC XY:
2938
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0459
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0763
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0354
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0295
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0584
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0601
Alfa
AF:
0.0549
Hom.:
454
Bravo
AF:
0.0384
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0491
AC:
182
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0560
AC:
216
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0128
AC:
40
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0613
AC:
439
ExAC
AF:
0.0423
AC:
5109
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0120
AC:
43
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0566
EpiControl
AF:
0.0567

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Mar 06, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27153395, 17119055, 24728327) -

Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group C Benign:3
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

Aug 27, 2018
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: XPC c.1475G>A (p.Arg492His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.042 in 276928 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 338 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 29-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in XPC causing Xeroderma Pigmentosum phenotype (0.0014), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1475G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Xeroderma Pigmentosum (Tamhankar_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Xeroderma Pigmentosum . Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) in a homozygous state has been reported (XPC c.1243C>T, p.R415X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. A ClinVar submission from another clinical diagnostic laboratory (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as "likely benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

XPC-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 23, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.074
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.61
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
1.5
DANN
Benign
0.90
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T
Eigen
Benign
-2.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.18
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.27
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0020
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.90
L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N
REVEL
Benign
0.012
Sift
Benign
0.23
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.011
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.0042
T
GERP RS
-4.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.014
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2227999; hg19: chr3-14199908; COSMIC: COSV53203815; COSMIC: COSV53203815; API