3-14178532-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_004628.5(XPC):āc.37G>Cā(p.Gly13Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000924 in 1,612,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004628.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPC | NM_004628.5 | c.37G>C | p.Gly13Arg | missense_variant | 1/16 | ENST00000285021.12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPC | ENST00000285021.12 | c.37G>C | p.Gly13Arg | missense_variant | 1/16 | 1 | NM_004628.5 | P1 | |
XPC | ENST00000476581.6 | c.37G>C | p.Gly13Arg | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1/15 | 1 | |||
XPC | ENST00000511155.1 | c.37G>C | p.Gly13Arg | missense_variant | 1/4 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000499 AC: 76AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000346 AC: 85AN: 245612Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000343 AC XY: 46AN XY: 134076
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000968 AC: 1414AN: 1460566Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000879 AC XY: 639AN XY: 726646
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000499 AC: 76AN: 152392Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000362 AC XY: 27AN XY: 74526
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group C Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 14, 2018 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 02, 2021 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in healthy individuals undergoing whole genome sequencing (Bodian 2014); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 25, 2021 | - - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 16, 2021 | - - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at