Menu
GeneBe

3-180616835-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):c.2397G>A(p.Val799=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.193 in 1,606,498 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31,673 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 2813 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.19 ( 28860 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC39
NM_181426.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.448
Variant links:
Genes affected
CCDC39 (HGNC:25244): (coiled-coil domain 39 molecular ruler complex subunit) The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the motility of cilia and flagella. The encoded protein is essential for the assembly of dynein regulatory and inner dynein arm complexes, which regulate ciliary beat. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia type 14 (CILD14). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]
TTC14 (HGNC:24697): (tetratricopeptide repeat domain 14) Predicted to enable nucleic acid binding activity. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 3-180616835-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-180616835-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 162839.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-180616835-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.448 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.206 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CCDC39NM_181426.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2397G>A p.Val799= synonymous_variant 17/20 ENST00000476379.6
TTC14NM_001288582.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1775-545C>T intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CCDC39ENST00000476379.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2397G>A p.Val799= synonymous_variant 17/202 NM_181426.2 P2Q9UFE4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.185
AC:
28153
AN:
151998
Hom.:
2810
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.160
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.184
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.199
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.147
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.111
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.248
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.152
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.209
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.192
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.176
AC:
43280
AN:
246428
Hom.:
4229
AF XY:
0.174
AC XY:
23216
AN XY:
133752
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.155
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.181
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.156
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.119
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.248
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.207
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.188
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.194
AC:
282625
AN:
1454382
Hom.:
28860
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.192
AC XY:
138607
AN XY:
723594
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.153
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.184
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.124
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.252
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.207
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.182
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.185
AC:
28177
AN:
152116
Hom.:
2813
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.185
AC XY:
13778
AN XY:
74348
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.160
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.200
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.147
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00232
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.112
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.248
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.209
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.190
Alfa
AF:
0.193
Hom.:
2020
Bravo
AF:
0.179
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0600
AC:
211
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.202
EpiControl
AF:
0.198

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 21, 2013Val799Val in exon 17 of CCDC39: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 19.5% (1589/8130) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs7612917). -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 07, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 14 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 10, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
Cadd
Benign
2.5
Dann
Benign
0.75
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7612917; hg19: chr3-180334623; API