3-30606691-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP7
The XM_047449400.1(LOC105377015):c.234C>T(p.Gly78=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000164 in 389,722 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain risk allele (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000067 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
LOC105377015
XM_047449400.1 synonymous
XM_047449400.1 synonymous
Scores
1
1
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.12
Genes affected
TGFBR2 (HGNC:11773): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a transmembrane protein that has a protein kinase domain, forms a heterodimeric complex with TGF-beta receptor type-1, and binds TGF-beta. This receptor/ligand complex phosphorylates proteins, which then enter the nucleus and regulate the transcription of genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, wound healing, immunosuppression, and tumorigenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Marfan Syndrome, Loeys-Deitz Aortic Aneurysm Syndrome, and the development of various types of tumors. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.28).
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.12 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOC105377015 | XM_047449400.1 | c.234C>T | p.Gly78= | synonymous_variant | 1/2 | ||
TGFBR2 | NM_003242.6 | c.-193G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/7 | ENST00000295754.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR2 | ENST00000295754.10 | c.-193G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/7 | 1 | NM_003242.6 | P1 | ||
TGFBR2 | ENST00000359013.4 | c.-193G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
47
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000674 AC: 16AN: 237480Hom.: 0 Cov.: 3 AF XY: 0.0000334 AC XY: 4AN XY: 119722
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
237480
Hom.:
Cov.:
3
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
119722
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000315 AC: 48AN: 152242Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74434
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
48
AN:
152242
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
74434
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3472
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance/Uncertain risk allele
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Marfan syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Malignant tumor of esophagus;C1860896:Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 6;C2674574:Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 23, 2021 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Diabetic retinopathy Other:1
Uncertain risk allele, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | Potent mutations in TGFBR2 gene encodes the transforming growth factor that have been associated with angiogenesis and diabetic retinopathy. More clinical studies are needed for stronger association. However, more evidence is required to confer the association of this particular variant rs886058301 with diabetic retinopathy. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at