3-30672245-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_003242.6(TGFBR2):c.1062C>T(p.Leu354Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00347 in 1,604,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0036 ( 34 hom. )
Consequence
TGFBR2
NM_003242.6 synonymous
NM_003242.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.192
Genes affected
TGFBR2 (HGNC:11773): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a transmembrane protein that has a protein kinase domain, forms a heterodimeric complex with TGF-beta receptor type-1, and binds TGF-beta. This receptor/ligand complex phosphorylates proteins, which then enter the nucleus and regulate the transcription of genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, wound healing, immunosuppression, and tumorigenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Marfan Syndrome, Loeys-Deitz Aortic Aneurysm Syndrome, and the development of various types of tumors. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 3-30672245-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-30672245-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137636.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-30672245-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr3-30672245-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.192 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 362 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR2 | NM_003242.6 | c.1062C>T | p.Leu354Leu | synonymous_variant | 4/7 | ENST00000295754.10 | NP_003233.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR2 | ENST00000295754.10 | c.1062C>T | p.Leu354Leu | synonymous_variant | 4/7 | 1 | NM_003242.6 | ENSP00000295754.5 | ||
TGFBR2 | ENST00000359013.4 | c.1137C>T | p.Leu379Leu | synonymous_variant | 5/8 | 1 | ENSP00000351905.4 | |||
TGFBR2 | ENST00000672866.1 | n.2658C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00238 AC: 363AN: 152210Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
363
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00376 AC: 922AN: 245216Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00470 AC XY: 621AN XY: 132152
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
922
AN:
245216
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
621
AN XY:
132152
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00359 AC: 5206AN: 1451916Hom.: 34 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00403 AC XY: 2908AN XY: 720770
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5206
AN:
1451916
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
2908
AN XY:
720770
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00238 AC: 362AN: 152328Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00252 AC XY: 188AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
362
AN:
152328
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
188
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 26, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 25, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 04, 2015 | p.Leu354Leu in exon 4 of TGFBR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1.6% (236/14206) of South Asian chromosomes including 5 homozygotes by the Exome Aggregation Cons ortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs113194608). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 08, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Sep 20, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 10, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | TGFBR2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Marfan syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Apr 29, 2022 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 10, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at