3-38482567-G-T

Position:

chr3-38482567-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001106.4(ACVR2B):c.1344+7G>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00246 in 1,609,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 84 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 38 hom., cov: 28)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 46 hom. )

Consequence

ACVR2B
NM_001106.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0003885

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.05

Variant links:

Genes affected

ACVR2B (HGNC:174): (activin A receptor type 2B) Activins are dimeric growth and differentiation factors which belong to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of structurally related signaling proteins. Activins signal through a heteromeric complex of receptor serine kinases which include at least two type I (I and IB) and two type II (II and IIB) receptors. These receptors are all transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine specificity. Type I receptors are essential for signaling; and type II receptors are required for binding ligands and for expression of type I receptors. Type I and II receptors form a stable complex after ligand binding, resulting in phosphorylation of type I receptors by type II receptors. Type II receptors are considered to be constitutively active kinases. This gene encodes activin A type IIB receptor, which displays a 3- to 4-fold higher affinity for the ligand than activin A type II receptor. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACVR2B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).

BP6

Variant 3-38482567-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38482567-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136291.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-38482567-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0131 (1994/151896) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0449 (1859/41386). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0432. There are 38 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 937 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 28. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1994 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
ACVR2B	NM_001106.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1344+7G>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000352511.5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
ACVR2B	ENST00000352511.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1344+7G>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	1	NM_001106.4	P1	Q13705-1
ACVR2B	ENST00000461232.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.5133+7G>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant	1
ACVR2B	ENST00000465020.5 linkuse as main transcript	n.1430+7G>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0132

AC:

1998

AN:

151778

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0451

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00650

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000417

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00814

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00334

AC:

816

AN:

244456

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00223

AC XY:

294

AN XY:

131844

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0451

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00263

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000101

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000126

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00185

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00135

AC:

1972

AN:

1457110

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00115

AC XY:

831

AN XY:

724416

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0448

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00298

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000384

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000940

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000113

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00333

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0131

AC:

1994

AN:

151896

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0126

AC XY:

937

AN XY:

74240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0449

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00643

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000417

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00806

Alfa

AF:

0.00570

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0144

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Heterotaxy, visceral, 4, autosomal

Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	Oct 09, 2014	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	Sep 21, 2015	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 15, 2024	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Sep 24, 2013	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

9.0

DANN

Benign

0.74

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00039

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0040

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over