3-38482567-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001106.4(ACVR2B):​c.1344+7G>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00246 in 1,609,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 84 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 38 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 46 hom. )

Consequence

ACVR2B
NM_001106.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0003885
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.05
Variant links:
Genes affected
ACVR2B (HGNC:174): (activin A receptor type 2B) Activins are dimeric growth and differentiation factors which belong to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of structurally related signaling proteins. Activins signal through a heteromeric complex of receptor serine kinases which include at least two type I (I and IB) and two type II (II and IIB) receptors. These receptors are all transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine specificity. Type I receptors are essential for signaling; and type II receptors are required for binding ligands and for expression of type I receptors. Type I and II receptors form a stable complex after ligand binding, resulting in phosphorylation of type I receptors by type II receptors. Type II receptors are considered to be constitutively active kinases. This gene encodes activin A type IIB receptor, which displays a 3- to 4-fold higher affinity for the ligand than activin A type II receptor. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 3-38482567-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38482567-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136291.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-38482567-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0131 (1994/151896) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0449 (1859/41386). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0432. There are 38 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 937 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 28. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1994 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ACVR2BNM_001106.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1344+7G>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000352511.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ACVR2BENST00000352511.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1344+7G>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_001106.4 P1Q13705-1
ACVR2BENST00000461232.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.5133+7G>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 1
ACVR2BENST00000465020.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.1430+7G>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0132
AC:
1998
AN:
151778
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
28
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0451
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00650
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000417
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00814
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00334
AC:
816
AN:
244456
Hom.:
15
AF XY:
0.00223
AC XY:
294
AN XY:
131844
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0451
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00185
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00135
AC:
1972
AN:
1457110
Hom.:
46
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00115
AC XY:
831
AN XY:
724416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0448
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00298
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000384
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000940
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000113
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00333
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0131
AC:
1994
AN:
151896
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.0126
AC XY:
937
AN XY:
74240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0449
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00643
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000417
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00806
Alfa
AF:
0.00570
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.0144
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Heterotaxy, visceral, 4, autosomal Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 15, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 24, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.74
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00039
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0040
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9876823; hg19: chr3-38524058; API