Menu
GeneBe

3-39383735-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_017875.4(SLC25A38):c.11A>G(p.Asn4Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00181 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N4N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

SLC25A38
NM_017875.4 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC25A38 (HGNC:26054): (solute carrier family 25 member 38) This gene is a member of the mitochondrial carrier family. The encoded protein is required during erythropoiesis and is important for the biosynthesis of heme. Mutations in this gene are the cause of autosomal congenital sideroblastic anemia (anemia, sideroblastic, 2, pyridoxine-refractory). A related pseudogene is found on chromosome 1. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009681672).
BP6
Variant 3-39383735-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-39383735-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 777964.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr3-39383735-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00145 (221/152224) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00271 (184/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00239. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 117 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SLC25A38NM_017875.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.11A>G p.Asn4Ser missense_variant 1/7 ENST00000650617.1
LOC105377644XR_007096252.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.85+506T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
SLC25A38NM_001354798.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.11A>G p.Asn4Ser missense_variant 1/6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SLC25A38ENST00000650617.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.11A>G p.Asn4Ser missense_variant 1/7 NM_017875.4 P1
ENST00000655387.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.60+506T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00145
AC:
221
AN:
152106
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00271
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00142
AC:
356
AN:
250928
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00144
AC XY:
196
AN XY:
135762
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00267
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00185
AC:
2706
AN:
1461798
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00183
AC XY:
1334
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000239
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000693
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000243
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00145
AC:
221
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00157
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00271
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00208
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00138
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00244
AC:
21
ExAC
AF:
0.00147
AC:
178
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00240
EpiControl
AF:
0.00302

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 15, 2021Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2023SLC25A38: BP4 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Sideroblastic anemia 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.077
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
Cadd
Benign
22
Dann
Benign
0.85
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0091
T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.76
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.65
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.90
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.034
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0097
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.13
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Uncertain
0.027
D;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.15
T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.;.
Vest4
0.12
MVP
0.71
MPC
0.19
ClinPred
0.033
T
GERP RS
3.1
Varity_R
0.060
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61995897; hg19: chr3-39425226; API