3-52405827-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 1P and 17B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting
The NM_004656.4(BAP1):āc.869A>Gā(p.Asn290Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000911 in 1,613,970 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004656.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP1 | NM_004656.4 | c.869A>G | p.Asn290Ser | missense_variant | 10/17 | ENST00000460680.6 | NP_004647.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAP1 | ENST00000460680.6 | c.869A>G | p.Asn290Ser | missense_variant | 10/17 | 1 | NM_004656.4 | ENSP00000417132.1 | ||
BAP1 | ENST00000296288.9 | c.815A>G | p.Asn272Ser | missense_variant | 10/17 | 5 | ENSP00000296288.5 | |||
BAP1 | ENST00000471532.5 | n.1036A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/5 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000485 AC: 122AN: 251416Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000375 AC XY: 51AN XY: 135900
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000930 AC: 136AN: 1461742Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000853 AC XY: 62AN XY: 727160
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74370
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 19, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 31, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 18, 2016 | - - |
BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 03, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 06, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 16, 2022 | - - |
BAP1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 08, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at