chr3-52405827-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_004656.4(BAP1):c.869A>G(p.Asn290Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000911 in 1,613,970 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N290T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000093 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BAP1
NM_004656.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.830

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV56238779

Genes affected

BAP1 (HGNC:950): (BRCA1 associated protein 1) This gene belongs to the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase subfamily of deubiquitinating enzymes that are involved in the removal of ubiquitin from proteins. The encoded enzyme binds to the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) via the RING finger domain of the latter and acts as a tumor suppressor. In addition, the enzyme may be involved in regulation of transcription, regulation of cell cycle and growth, response to DNA damage and chromatin dynamics. Germline mutations in this gene may be associated with tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS), which involves increased risk of cancers including malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

BAP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Kury-Isidor syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
renal cell carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

BAP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004228443).

BP6

Variant 3-52405827-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-52405827-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 472716.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000093 (136/1461742) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00295 (132/44724). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00254. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 62 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004656.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	BAP1	NM_004656.4	MANE Select	c.869A>G	p.Asn290Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 17	NP_004647.1
	BAP1	NM_001410772.1		c.815A>G	p.Asn272Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 17	NP_001397701.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
BAP1	ENST00000460680.6	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.869A>G	p.Asn290Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 17	ENSP00000417132.1
BAP1	ENST00000296288.9	TSL:5	c.815A>G	p.Asn272Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 17	ENSP00000296288.5
BAP1	ENST00000471532.5	TSL:5	n.1036A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 5 of 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000720

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000485

AC:

122

AN:

251416

AF XY:

0.000375

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00344

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000930

AC:

136

AN:

1461742

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000853

AC XY:

AN XY:

727160

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00295

AC:

132

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86248

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53402

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5670

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000497

AC:

AN:

60376

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74370

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41460

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000720

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5204

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000142

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000272

ExAC

AF:

0.000445

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions as Germline

Significance:Benign/Likely benign

Revision:criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome (3)

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome (2)

not provided (2)

BAP1-related disorder (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.048

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.64

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.70

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.76

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.022

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.84

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.13

LIST_S2

Benign

0.62

M_CAP

Benign

0.0054

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0042

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-1.5

PhyloP100

0.83

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.57

REVEL

Benign

0.078

Sift

Benign

1.0

Sift4G

Benign

0.70

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.027

MutPred

0.36

Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0024)

MVP

0.33

MPC

0.30

ClinPred

0.015

GERP RS

3.5

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.021

gMVP

0.20

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over