3-69959424-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001354604.2(MITF):c.1179+4C>T variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000781 in 1,613,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000083 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MITF
NM_001354604.2 splice_donor_region, intron
NM_001354604.2 splice_donor_region, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00007573
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.121
Genes affected
MITF (HGNC:7105): (melanocyte inducing transcription factor) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor that contains both basic helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper structural features. The encoded protein regulates melanocyte development and is responsible for pigment cell-specific transcription of the melanogenesis enzyme genes. Heterozygous mutations in the this gene cause auditory-pigmentary syndromes, such as Waardenburg syndrome type 2 and Tietz syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 3-69959424-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-69959424-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 517197.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr3-69959424-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MITF | NM_000248.4 | c.858+4C>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000394351.9 | NP_000239.1 | |||
MITF | NM_001354604.2 | c.1179+4C>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000352241.9 | NP_001341533.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MITF | ENST00000352241.9 | c.1179+4C>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_001354604.2 | ENSP00000295600 | P4 | |||
MITF | ENST00000394351.9 | c.858+4C>T | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_000248.4 | ENSP00000377880 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000144 AC: 36AN: 250572Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 22AN XY: 135408
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
36
AN:
250572
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
135408
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000828 AC: 121AN: 1461532Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 59AN XY: 727060
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
121
AN:
1461532
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
727060
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74292
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74292
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 19, 2017 | The c.1161+4C>T variant in MITF has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss. It has been identified in 23/65822 European chromosomes by th e Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs74 9869303). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its fre quency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. This variant is locate d in the 5' splice region. Computational tools do not suggest an impact to splic ing. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicit y. In summary, the clinical significance of the c.1161+4C>T variant is uncertain . - |
Tietz syndrome;C1860339:Waardenburg syndrome type 2A;C3152204:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | This sequence change falls in intron 8 of the MITF gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the MITF protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. This variant is present in population databases (rs749869303, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MITF-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 517197). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Apr 03, 2023 | The MITF c.1161+4C>T intronic change results in a C to T substitution at the +4 position of intron 9 of the MITF gene. Algorithms that predict the impact of sequence changes on splicing indicate that this variant does not affect splicing. This variant has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.026% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
MITF-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 31, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 29, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at