3-81648979-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000158.4(GBE1):​c.568A>G​(p.Arg190Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.305 in 1,571,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75,472 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.30 ( 6997 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.31 ( 68475 hom. )

Consequence

GBE1
NM_000158.4 missense

Scores

1
7
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.51

Publications

44 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GBE1 (HGNC:4180): (1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a glycogen branching enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of alpha-1,4-linked glucosyl units from the outer end of a glycogen chain to an alpha-1,6 position on the same or a neighboring glycogen chain. Branching of the chains is essential to increase the solubility of the glycogen molecule and, consequently, in reducing the osmotic pressure within cells. Highest level of this enzyme are found in liver and muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with glycogen storage disease IV (also known as Andersen's disease). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
GBE1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • glycogen storage disease due to glycogen branching enzyme deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics, G2P, ClinGen
  • adult polyglucosan body disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002937764).
BP6
Variant 3-81648979-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-81648979-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 197636.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.429 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GBE1NM_000158.4 linkc.568A>G p.Arg190Gly missense_variant Exon 5 of 16 ENST00000429644.7 NP_000149.4
GBE1XR_007095662.1 linkn.696A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 15

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GBE1ENST00000429644.7 linkc.568A>G p.Arg190Gly missense_variant Exon 5 of 16 1 NM_000158.4 ENSP00000410833.2
GBE1ENST00000489715.1 linkc.445A>G p.Arg149Gly missense_variant Exon 5 of 16 2 ENSP00000419638.1
GBE1ENST00000486920.1 linkn.564A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 2 3
GBE1ENST00000498468.1 linkn.96A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 4 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.299
AC:
45374
AN:
151906
Hom.:
6994
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.274
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.198
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.259
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.206
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.445
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.310
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.402
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.231
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.302
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.270
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.317
AC:
70584
AN:
222350
AF XY:
0.316
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.278
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.295
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.211
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.452
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.412
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.305
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.300
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.306
AC:
434420
AN:
1419218
Hom.:
68475
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.305
AC XY:
215363
AN XY:
705024
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.275
AC:
8798
AN:
31946
American (AMR)
AF:
0.292
AC:
12046
AN:
41306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.206
AC:
5287
AN:
25606
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.432
AC:
16756
AN:
38784
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.296
AC:
23806
AN:
80334
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.414
AC:
21522
AN:
52018
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.210
AC:
1196
AN:
5690
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.302
AC:
327313
AN:
1084656
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.301
AC:
17696
AN:
58878
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11814
23628
35443
47257
59071
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10750
21500
32250
43000
53750
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.299
AC:
45395
AN:
152024
Hom.:
6997
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.303
AC XY:
22480
AN XY:
74284
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.274
AC:
11370
AN:
41500
American (AMR)
AF:
0.259
AC:
3960
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.206
AC:
715
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.444
AC:
2298
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.311
AC:
1500
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.402
AC:
4244
AN:
10552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.224
AC:
66
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.302
AC:
20489
AN:
67904
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.271
AC:
572
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1622
3243
4865
6486
8108
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
466
932
1398
1864
2330
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.299
Hom.:
28517
Bravo
AF:
0.290
TwinsUK
AF:
0.309
AC:
1144
ALSPAC
AF:
0.304
AC:
1170
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.277
AC:
992
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.301
AC:
2441
ExAC
AF:
0.306
AC:
36856
Asia WGS
AF:
0.391
AC:
1360
AN:
3472

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 30, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 17, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Glycogen storage disease, type IV Benign:5
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 15, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Adult polyglucosan body disease Benign:3
Aug 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 15, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Oct 20, 2015
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Glycogen storage disease, type IV;C1856301:Glycogen storage disease IV, classic hepatic Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.71
D;T
Eigen
Benign
0.18
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.30
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0029
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M;.
PhyloP100
3.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.5
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.32
Sift
Uncertain
0.020
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.066
T;T
Polyphen
0.013
B;B
Vest4
0.089
MPC
0.041
ClinPred
0.056
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.37
gMVP
0.68
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229519; hg19: chr3-81698130; COSMIC: COSV70097964; API