4-105275794-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001127208.3(TET2):c.5284A>T(p.Ile1762Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000516 in 1,551,426 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I1762V) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001127208.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001127208.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TET2 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.5284A>T | p.Ile1762Leu | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000369351.4 | Q6N021-1 | ||
| TET2 | TSL:1 | c.5347A>T | p.Ile1783Leu | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000425443.1 | E7EQS8 | ||
| TET2 | TSL:1 | c.5284A>T | p.Ile1762Leu | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000442788.1 | Q6N021-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152040Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000643 AC: 1AN: 155570 AF XY: 0.0000121 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000214 AC: 3AN: 1399386Hom.: 0 Cov.: 49 AF XY: 0.00000290 AC XY: 2AN XY: 690192 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152040Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000539 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74236 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at