4-105275959-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001127208.3(TET2):c.5449C>T(p.His1817Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H1817N) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001127208.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001127208.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TET2 | NM_001127208.3 | MANE Select | c.5449C>T | p.His1817Tyr | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | NP_001120680.1 | ||
| TET2-AS1 | NR_126420.1 | n.318+58427G>A | intron | N/A |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TET2 | ENST00000380013.9 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.5449C>T | p.His1817Tyr | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000369351.4 | ||
| TET2 | ENST00000513237.5 | TSL:1 | c.5512C>T | p.His1838Tyr | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000425443.1 | ||
| TET2 | ENST00000540549.5 | TSL:1 | c.5449C>T | p.His1817Tyr | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000442788.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at