4-113353362-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001148.6(ANK2):c.4744C>T(p.Arg1582Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00184 in 1,613,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1582Q) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001148.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANK2 | NM_001148.6 | c.4744C>T | p.Arg1582Trp | missense_variant | 38/46 | ENST00000357077.9 | NP_001139.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANK2 | ENST00000357077.9 | c.4744C>T | p.Arg1582Trp | missense_variant | 38/46 | 1 | NM_001148.6 | ENSP00000349588.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00374 AC: 569AN: 151994Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00214 AC: 535AN: 250434Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00210 AC XY: 284AN XY: 135484
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00164 AC: 2399AN: 1461794Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 1150AN XY: 727196
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00373 AC: 568AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00391 AC XY: 291AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 13, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 06, 2018 | Variant summary: ANK2 c.4744C>T (p.Arg1582Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0024 in 278208 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, predominantly within the Finnish subpopulation at a frequency of 0.01, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Finnish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1000 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ANK2 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism. c.4744C>T has been reported in the literature in heterozygosity in healthy individuals without arrhythmia or elongation of the QT interval (Ghouse 2015). This report provides further support about the benign nature of the variant. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, without evidence for independent evaluation, classifying the variant as benign(2)/VUS(1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2023 | ANK2: BP4, BS2 - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | May 16, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Cardiac arrhythmia, ankyrin-B-related Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 23, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at