4-54272481-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.1325T>C(p.Leu442Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000944 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L442F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006206.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- gastrointestinal stromal tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
 - polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinalInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P
 - congenital heart diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
 - isolated cleft palateInheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDGFRA | ENST00000257290.10  | c.1325T>C | p.Leu442Pro | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 23 | 1 | NM_006206.6 | ENSP00000257290.5 | ||
| PDGFRA | ENST00000509092.5  | n.1143T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 8 of 15 | 1 | |||||
| PDGFRA | ENST00000509490.5  | n.1325T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 9 of 18 | 1 | ENSP00000424218.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000282278 | ENST00000507166.5  | c.1018-2444T>C | intron_variant | Intron 12 of 23 | 2 | ENSP00000423325.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.000644  AC: 98AN: 152160Hom.:  0  Cov.: 31 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.000474  AC: 119AN: 251276 AF XY:  0.000471   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.000975  AC: 1425AN: 1461792Hom.:  1  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.00100  AC XY: 728AN XY: 727222 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.000644  AC: 98AN: 152278Hom.:  0  Cov.: 31 AF XY:  0.000564  AC XY: 42AN XY: 74468 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided    Uncertain:3 
- -
- -
The PDGFRA p.Leu455Pro variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139236922) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Fulgent Genetics, Ambry Genetics and Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health, and as likely benign by Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 133 of 268128 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000496 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1, non-cancer). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 97 of 118008 chromosomes (freq: 0.000822), Latino in 18 of 35102 chromosomes (freq: 0.000513), Other in 3 of 6694 chromosomes (freq: 0.000448), South Asian in 11 of 30526 chromosomes (freq: 0.00036), African in 3 of 23608 chromosomes (freq: 0.000127) and European (Finnish) in 1 of 25092 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The p.Leu455 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome    Uncertain:1Benign:1 
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome    Uncertain:1 
- -
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome;C0238198:Gastrointestinal stromal tumor    Uncertain:1 
- -
PDGFRA-related disorder    Benign:1 
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor    Benign:1 
- -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at