rs139236922

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):ā€‹c.1325T>Cā€‹(p.Leu442Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000944 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00064 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00097 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.24
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03461668).
BP6
Variant 4-54272481-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54272481-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41793.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=1, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 98 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PDGFRANM_006206.6 linkc.1325T>C p.Leu442Pro missense_variant 9/23 ENST00000257290.10 NP_006197.1 P16234-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PDGFRAENST00000257290.10 linkc.1325T>C p.Leu442Pro missense_variant 9/231 NM_006206.6 ENSP00000257290.5 P16234-1
ENSG00000282278ENST00000507166.5 linkc.1018-2444T>C intron_variant 2 ENSP00000423325.1 A0A0B4J203
PDGFRAENST00000509092.5 linkn.1143T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 8/151
PDGFRAENST00000509490.5 linkn.1325T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 9/181 ENSP00000424218.1 P16234-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000644
AC:
98
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000474
AC:
119
AN:
251276
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000471
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
135800
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000549
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000731
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000975
AC:
1425
AN:
1461792
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00100
AC XY:
728
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000470
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000679
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000644
AC:
98
AN:
152278
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000564
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000949
Alfa
AF:
0.000850
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000737
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000930
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000420
AC:
51
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000872
EpiControl
AF:
0.000711

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The PDGFRA p.Leu455Pro variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139236922) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Fulgent Genetics, Ambry Genetics and Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health, and as likely benign by Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 133 of 268128 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000496 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1, non-cancer). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 97 of 118008 chromosomes (freq: 0.000822), Latino in 18 of 35102 chromosomes (freq: 0.000513), Other in 3 of 6694 chromosomes (freq: 0.000448), South Asian in 11 of 30526 chromosomes (freq: 0.00036), African in 3 of 23608 chromosomes (freq: 0.000127) and European (Finnish) in 1 of 25092 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The p.Leu455 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 22, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 20, 2024This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityJun 09, 2023- -
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome;C0238198:Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
PDGFRA-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 13, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 03, 2025- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.097
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.041
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.028
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.032
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.87
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.73
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.052
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.035
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.59
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.14
N
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
0.23
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.33
T
Polyphen
0.90
P
Vest4
0.49
MVP
0.60
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
0.039
T
GERP RS
5.0
Varity_R
0.27
gMVP
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139236922; hg19: chr4-55138648; COSMIC: COSV57264507; COSMIC: COSV57264507; API