4-54698341-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP2BP4BS2
The NM_000222.3(KIT):c.395C>T(p.Thr132Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000062 in 1,613,922 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T132A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000222.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- gastrointestinal stromal tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- piebaldismInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- cutaneous mastocytosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- mastocytosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIT | NM_000222.3 | c.395C>T | p.Thr132Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 21 | ENST00000288135.6 | NP_000213.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIT | ENST00000288135.6 | c.395C>T | p.Thr132Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 21 | 1 | NM_000222.3 | ENSP00000288135.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 250980 AF XY: 0.00000737 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000547 AC: 8AN: 1461732Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727174 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 132 of the KIT protein (p.Thr132Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs766253584, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with KIT-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 528574). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.T132M variant (also known as c.395C>T), located in coding exon 3 of the KIT gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 395. The threonine at codon 132 is replaced by methionine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at