4-77158615-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_004354.3(CCNG2):āc.83A>Gā(p.Glu28Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000804 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004354.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCNG2 | NM_004354.3 | c.83A>G | p.Glu28Gly | missense_variant | 2/8 | ENST00000316355.10 | NP_004345.1 | |
CCNG2 | XM_011532398.2 | c.83A>G | p.Glu28Gly | missense_variant | 2/8 | XP_011530700.1 | ||
CCNG2 | XM_011532399.3 | c.83A>G | p.Glu28Gly | missense_variant | 2/8 | XP_011530701.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCNG2 | ENST00000316355.10 | c.83A>G | p.Glu28Gly | missense_variant | 2/8 | 1 | NM_004354.3 | ENSP00000315743.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00444 AC: 675AN: 152130Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00115 AC: 290AN: 251494Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000831 AC XY: 113AN XY: 135920
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000427 AC: 624AN: 1461880Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000347 AC XY: 252AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00443 AC: 674AN: 152248Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00426 AC XY: 317AN XY: 74436
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Apr 04, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at