5-1268585-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_198253.3(TERT):​c.2517G>A​(p.Thr839Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00233 in 1,613,422 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T839T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0024 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

TERT
NM_198253.3 synonymous

Scores

1
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.36

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
TERT Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2
    Inheritance: AR, AD, SD, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • acute myeloid leukemia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • dyskeratosis congenita
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 9
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.176).
BP6
Variant 5-1268585-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-1268585-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 263107.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.36 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00194 (295/152358) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0058 (28/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00412. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 165 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,AD,SD,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TERTNM_198253.3 linkc.2517G>A p.Thr839Thr synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENST00000310581.10 NP_937983.2 O14746-1
TERTNM_001193376.3 linkc.2517G>A p.Thr839Thr synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 15 NP_001180305.1 O14746-3
TERTNR_149162.3 linkn.2414G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 7 of 13
TERTNR_149163.3 linkn.2378G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 7 of 13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TERTENST00000310581.10 linkc.2517G>A p.Thr839Thr synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 16 1 NM_198253.3 ENSP00000309572.5 O14746-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00193
AC:
294
AN:
152240
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00720
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00559
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00715
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00282
AC:
706
AN:
250212
AF XY:
0.00314
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000186
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000376
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00699
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00712
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00237
AC:
3460
AN:
1461064
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00253
AC XY:
1841
AN XY:
726792
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000269
AC:
9
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000403
AC:
18
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00784
AC:
205
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00786
AC:
678
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00593
AC:
312
AN:
52636
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00659
AC:
38
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00182
AC:
2026
AN:
1111982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00288
AC:
174
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.462
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
178
356
534
712
890
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
82
164
246
328
410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00194
AC:
295
AN:
152358
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00221
AC XY:
165
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000361
AC:
15
AN:
41588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
16
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00720
AC:
25
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00580
AC:
28
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00715
AC:
76
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00188
AC:
128
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
30
44
59
74
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00198
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00134
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00196
EpiControl
AF:
0.00202

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TERT: BP4, BP7 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:2
Mar 25, 2019
Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:2
Sep 21, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oct 16, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Aplastic anemia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 9 Benign:1
Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acute myeloid leukemia Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.12
CADD
Benign
0.15
DANN
Benign
0.95
PhyloP100
-1.4
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140124989; hg19: chr5-1268700; COSMIC: COSV104395555; API