5-1271155-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_198253.3(TERT):c.2432G>A(p.Arg811His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,613,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R811C) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198253.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2Inheritance: AR, AD, SD, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- acute myeloid leukemiaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- dyskeratosis congenitaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 9Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TERT | NM_198253.3 | c.2432G>A | p.Arg811His | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 16 | ENST00000310581.10 | NP_937983.2 | |
| TERT | NM_001193376.3 | c.2432G>A | p.Arg811His | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 15 | NP_001180305.1 | ||
| TERT | NR_149162.3 | n.2366-2522G>A | intron_variant | Intron 6 of 12 | ||||
| TERT | NR_149163.3 | n.2330-2522G>A | intron_variant | Intron 6 of 12 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TERT | ENST00000310581.10 | c.2432G>A | p.Arg811His | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 16 | 1 | NM_198253.3 | ENSP00000309572.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000161 AC: 4AN: 248344 AF XY: 0.0000296 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1460780Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 726662 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000268 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74500 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
not provided Uncertain:1
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27149842)
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at