5-128286748-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.6982G>T(p.Ala2328Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000415 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A2328A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001999.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital contractural arachnodactylyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- carpal tunnel syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- macular degeneration, early-onsetInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001999.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBN2 | NM_001999.4 | MANE Select | c.6982G>T | p.Ala2328Ser | missense | Exon 55 of 65 | NP_001990.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.6982G>T | p.Ala2328Ser | missense | Exon 55 of 65 | ENSP00000262464.4 | ||
| FBN2 | ENST00000703783.1 | n.3766G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 30 of 38 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000637 AC: 16AN: 251374 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000424 AC: 62AN: 1461822Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000413 AC XY: 30AN XY: 727206 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74380 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
FBN2: BP4
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis suggests that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Although located in a calcium-binding EGF-like domain of the FBN2 gene, it does not substitute or introduce a cysteine residue (PMID: 19006240, 18767143); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19006240, 18767143)
Macular degeneration, early-onset Uncertain:1
This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BP4.
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:1
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at