5-132385512-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):​c.824+13T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.404 in 1,609,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 137,584 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.41 ( 13078 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.40 ( 124506 hom. )

Consequence

SLC22A5
NM_003060.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.144

Publications

45 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC22A5 (HGNC:10969): (solute carrier family 22 member 5) Polyspecific organic cation transporters in the liver, kidney, intestine, and other organs are critical for elimination of many endogenous small organic cations as well as a wide array of drugs and environmental toxins. The encoded protein is a plasma integral membrane protein which functions both as an organic cation transporter and as a sodium-dependent high affinity carnitine transporter. The encoded protein is involved in the active cellular uptake of carnitine. Mutations in this gene are the cause of systemic primary carnitine deficiency (CDSP), an autosomal recessive disorder manifested early in life by hypoketotic hypoglycemia and acute metabolic decompensation, and later in life by skeletal myopathy or cardiomyopathy. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]
SLC22A5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • systemic primary carnitine deficiency disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 5-132385512-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132385512-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 94102.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.651 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC22A5NM_003060.4 linkc.824+13T>C intron_variant Intron 4 of 9 ENST00000245407.8 NP_003051.1 O76082-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC22A5ENST00000245407.8 linkc.824+13T>C intron_variant Intron 4 of 9 1 NM_003060.4 ENSP00000245407.3 O76082-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.406
AC:
61669
AN:
151988
Hom.:
13070
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.359
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.238
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.351
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.416
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.670
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.640
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.511
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.491
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.395
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.391
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.435
AC:
109129
AN:
250752
AF XY:
0.448
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.357
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.402
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.643
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.508
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.387
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.421
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.404
AC:
589082
AN:
1457640
Hom.:
124506
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.412
AC XY:
298653
AN XY:
725370
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.354
AC:
11818
AN:
33416
American (AMR)
AF:
0.325
AC:
14515
AN:
44672
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.400
AC:
10456
AN:
26112
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.668
AC:
26484
AN:
39648
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.621
AC:
53497
AN:
86164
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.505
AC:
26940
AN:
53348
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.471
AC:
2708
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.377
AC:
417593
AN:
1108234
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.416
AC:
25071
AN:
60294
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16272
32545
48817
65090
81362
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
13236
26472
39708
52944
66180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.406
AC:
61709
AN:
152106
Hom.:
13078
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.417
AC XY:
30994
AN XY:
74350
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.359
AC:
14901
AN:
41498
American (AMR)
AF:
0.352
AC:
5373
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.416
AC:
1443
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.670
AC:
3462
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.641
AC:
3095
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.511
AC:
5398
AN:
10566
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.473
AC:
139
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.395
AC:
26853
AN:
67980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.391
AC:
828
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1859
3717
5576
7434
9293
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
594
1188
1782
2376
2970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.389
Hom.:
20278
Bravo
AF:
0.385
Asia WGS
AF:
0.617
AC:
2145
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal carnitine transport defect Benign:5
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 15, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 20, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 07, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Apr 18, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary:The c.824+13T>C in SLC22A5 gene is an intronic change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 44%, including numerous homozygous occurrences. The observed frequency exceeds the maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic SLC22A variant, suggesting that it is a common polymorphism. In addition, the variant has been reported as Benign/Polymorphism by reputable database/clinical laboratory and published reports (Tang et al., 2002). Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
2.0
DANN
Benign
0.43
PhyloP100
-0.14
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs274557; hg19: chr5-131721204; COSMIC: COSV55372528; COSMIC: COSV55372528; API