Menu
GeneBe

5-148111839-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006846.4(SPINK5):c.1764T>G(p.Ile588Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00173 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 50 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0095 ( 29 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 21 hom. )

Consequence

SPINK5
NM_006846.4 missense

Scores

4
13

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.841
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPINK5 (HGNC:15464): (serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type 5) This gene encodes a multidomain serine protease inhibitor that contains 15 potential inhibitory domains. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products, which may exhibit unique activities and specificities. These proteins may play a role in skin and hair morphogenesis, as well as anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial protection of mucous epithelia. Mutations in this gene may result in Netherton syndrome, a disorder characterized by ichthyosis, defective cornification, and atopy. This gene is present in a gene cluster on chromosome 5. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
FBXO38-DT (HGNC:55589): (FBXO38 divergent transcript)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0043960214).
BP6
Variant 5-148111839-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-148111839-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 351527.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-148111839-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00946 (1440/152242) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0334 (1386/41546). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0319. There are 29 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 664 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 29 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SPINK5NM_006846.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1764T>G p.Ile588Met missense_variant 19/33 ENST00000256084.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SPINK5ENST00000256084.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1764T>G p.Ile588Met missense_variant 19/331 NM_006846.4 P2Q9NQ38-1
FBXO38-DTENST00000667608.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1257-18097A>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00947
AC:
1440
AN:
152124
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0335
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00223
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00224
AC:
560
AN:
249494
Hom.:
10
AF XY:
0.00154
AC XY:
209
AN XY:
135346
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0322
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000353
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000660
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000926
AC:
1353
AN:
1461782
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000762
AC XY:
554
AN XY:
727192
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0336
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000306
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00179
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00946
AC:
1440
AN:
152242
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00892
AC XY:
664
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0334
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00615
Alfa
AF:
0.00141
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.0105
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0282
AC:
111
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00278
AC:
336
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 29, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Ichthyosis linearis circumflexa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Netherton syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.22
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.55
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
Cadd
Benign
15
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.52
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.80
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.025
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;T;D;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0044
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.2
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M;M;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.98
D;D;.;D
Vest4
0.53
MVP
0.20
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
-6.7
Varity_R
0.23
gMVP
0.34

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35877540; hg19: chr5-147491402; API