5-16616886-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001034850.3(RETREG1):c.86C>T(p.Pro29Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0004 in 1,484,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001034850.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETREG1 | NM_001034850.3 | c.86C>T | p.Pro29Leu | missense_variant | 1/9 | ENST00000306320.10 | NP_001030022.1 | |
RETREG1-AS1 | NR_109946.1 | n.561+400G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | |||||
RETREG1 | XM_011514053.4 | c.86C>T | p.Pro29Leu | missense_variant | 1/10 | XP_011512355.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETREG1 | ENST00000306320.10 | c.86C>T | p.Pro29Leu | missense_variant | 1/9 | 1 | NM_001034850.3 | ENSP00000304642 | ||
RETREG1-AS1 | ENST00000653650.1 | n.329+400G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152022Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000223 AC: 19AN: 85362Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000227 AC XY: 11AN XY: 48484
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000409 AC: 545AN: 1332862Hom.: 4 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000423 AC XY: 278AN XY: 656884
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000322 AC: 49AN: 152132Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000390 AC XY: 29AN XY: 74376
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 06, 2020 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 25, 2018 | The FAM134B (aka RETREG1) c.86C>T; p.Pro29Leu variant (rs528532732), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature, gene specific variation databases, nor has it been previously identified by our laboratory. This variant is listed in the genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) with an East Asian population frequency of 0.3% (identified on 15 out of 5840 chromosomes). The proline at position 29 is weakly conserved, considering 11 species, and computational analyses of the effects of the p.Pro29Leu variant on protein structure and function do not predict a deleterious effect (SIFT: tolerated, PolyPhen-2: benign). Based on the available information, the clinical significance of the p.Pro29Leu variant cannot be determined with certainty. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 02, 2024 | - - |
Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2B Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 16, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at