6-135195806-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001130173.2(MYB):c.1007C>T(p.Thr336Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000576 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001130173.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYB | NM_001130173.2 | c.1007C>T | p.Thr336Ile | missense_variant | 9/16 | ENST00000341911.10 | NP_001123645.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYB | ENST00000341911.10 | c.1007C>T | p.Thr336Ile | missense_variant | 9/16 | 1 | NM_001130173.2 | ENSP00000339992 | A1 | |
MYB-AS1 | ENST00000455534.1 | n.103+87G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00323 AC: 492AN: 152138Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000792 AC: 199AN: 251410Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000493 AC XY: 67AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000295 AC: 431AN: 1461888Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000257 AC XY: 187AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00327 AC: 498AN: 152256Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00334 AC XY: 249AN XY: 74466
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 10, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at