6-33173698-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):​c.2628+3G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.566 in 1,565,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 254,710 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.58 ( 26065 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.56 ( 228645 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001475
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.23
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 6-33173698-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33173698-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 46560.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-33173698-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.767 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
COL11A2NM_080680.3 linkc.2628+3G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000341947.7 NP_542411.2 P13942A0A0C4DFS1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL11A2ENST00000341947.7 linkc.2628+3G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant 5 NM_080680.3 ENSP00000339915.2 A0A0C4DFS1
COL11A2ENST00000374708.8 linkc.2370+3G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant 5 ENSP00000363840.4 Q4VXY6
COL11A2ENST00000361917.6 linkc.1200+3G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant 5 ENSP00000355123.2 H0YIS1
COL11A2ENST00000477772.1 linkn.272+3311G>A intron_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.584
AC:
88095
AN:
150868
Hom.:
26050
Cov.:
28
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.596
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.536
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.641
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.675
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.788
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.632
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.518
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.687
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.550
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.607
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.604
AC:
127922
AN:
211774
Hom.:
39475
AF XY:
0.601
AC XY:
68694
AN XY:
114232
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.599
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.686
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.673
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.809
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.631
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.515
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.548
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.588
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.565
AC:
798514
AN:
1414528
Hom.:
228645
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.567
AC XY:
395908
AN XY:
698330
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.618
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.683
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.671
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.833
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.629
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.517
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.543
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.567
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.584
AC:
88142
AN:
150986
Hom.:
26065
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.584
AC XY:
43039
AN XY:
73742
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.595
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.641
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.675
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.788
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.633
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.518
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.550
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.610
Alfa
AF:
0.578
Hom.:
20219
Bravo
AF:
0.595
Asia WGS
AF:
0.677
AC:
2357
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 20122628+3G>A in Intron 35 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 44.8% (1993/4452) of European Am erican chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs970901). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 29, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 31, 2016- -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 53 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 03, 2025- -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00015
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs970901; hg19: chr6-33141475; API