6-33315989-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_005453.5(ZBTB22):c.928A>G(p.Thr310Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.533 in 1,613,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 230,792 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T310I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005453.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBTB22 | NM_005453.5 | c.928A>G | p.Thr310Ala | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | ENST00000431845.3 | NP_005444.4 | |
ZBTB22 | NM_001145338.2 | c.928A>G | p.Thr310Ala | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_001138810.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.539 AC: 81662AN: 151640Hom.: 22160 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.540 AC: 135569AN: 251230 AF XY: 0.547 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.532 AC: 777628AN: 1461828Hom.: 208597 Cov.: 84 AF XY: 0.536 AC XY: 389921AN XY: 727216 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.539 AC: 81752AN: 151758Hom.: 22195 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.541 AC XY: 40124AN XY: 74138 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at