6-35498022-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting
The NM_003322.6(TULP1):c.*305G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000416 in 553,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
TULP1
NM_003322.6 3_prime_UTR
NM_003322.6 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.636
Genes affected
TULP1 (HGNC:12423): (TUB like protein 1) This gene encodes a member of the tubby-like gene family (TULPs). Members of this family have been identified in plants, vertebrates, and invertebrates. TULP proteins share a conserved C-terminal region of approximately 200 amino acid residues. The protein encoded by this gene is thought to play a role in the physiology of photoreceptors. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive juvenile retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis-15. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000514 (206/401080) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00746 (202/27074). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00662. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 87 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 3. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TULP1 | NM_003322.6 | c.*305G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 15/15 | ENST00000229771.11 | ||
TULP1 | NM_001289395.2 | c.*305G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/14 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TULP1 | ENST00000229771.11 | c.*305G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 15/15 | 1 | NM_003322.6 | P4 | ||
TULP1 | ENST00000322263.8 | c.*305G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/14 | 1 | A2 | |||
TULP1 | ENST00000614066.4 | c.*305G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/14 | 5 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 151830Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
151830
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000514 AC: 206AN: 401080Hom.: 1 Cov.: 3 AF XY: 0.000414 AC XY: 87AN XY: 210138
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
206
AN:
401080
Hom.:
Cov.:
3
AF XY:
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
210138
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 151948Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000135 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74288
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
151948
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74288
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Leber congenital amaurosis 15 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at