6-52454128-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 4P and 5B. PM2PM5BP4BS2
The NM_018100.4(EFHC1):c.757G>A(p.Asp253Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,688 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D253Y) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018100.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFHC1 | NM_018100.4 | c.757G>A | p.Asp253Asn | missense_variant | 5/11 | ENST00000371068.11 | NP_060570.2 | |
EFHC1 | NM_001172420.2 | c.700G>A | p.Asp234Asn | missense_variant | 6/12 | NP_001165891.1 | ||
EFHC1 | NR_033327.2 | n.2083G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFHC1 | ENST00000371068.11 | c.757G>A | p.Asp253Asn | missense_variant | 5/11 | 1 | NM_018100.4 | ENSP00000360107 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461688Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727144
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Myoclonic epilepsy, juvenile, susceptibility to, 1;C5551411:Typical absence seizure Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 28, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at