6-75832925-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the p.Glu159Lys variant in the MYO6 gene is 0.7% for Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes in the Genome Aggregation Database (91/10146 with 95%CI), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA135641/MONDO:0019497/005

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00025 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MYO6
NM_004999.4 missense

Scores

15
1
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.60
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO6 (HGNC:7605): (myosin VI) This gene encodes a reverse-direction motor protein that moves toward the minus end of actin filaments and plays a role in intracellular vesicle and organelle transport. The protein consists of a motor domain containing an ATP- and an actin-binding site and a globular tail which interacts with other proteins. This protein maintains the structural integrity of inner ear hair cells and mutations in this gene cause non-syndromic autosomal dominant and recessive hearing loss. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO6NM_004999.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.475G>A p.Glu159Lys missense_variant 6/35 ENST00000369977.8 NP_004990.3 Q9UM54-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO6ENST00000369977.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.475G>A p.Glu159Lys missense_variant 6/351 NM_004999.4 ENSP00000358994.3 Q9UM54-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152166
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000466
AC:
117
AN:
251284
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000479
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
135808
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00923
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000276
AC:
403
AN:
1461088
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000286
AC XY:
208
AN XY:
726922
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00877
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000646
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152166
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74322
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000866
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000272
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000354
AC:
43
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 10, 2024In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Classified as benign by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel (ClinVar SCV000840548.3; PMID: 30311386); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30311386) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 28, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2023MYO6: PP3, BS1 -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaOct 30, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 29, 2016The p.Glu159Lys variant in MYO6 has been identified by our laboratory in 1 indiv idual with hearing loss and in 38/66510 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggreg ation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201507590). Comp utational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong suppo rt for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical significanc e of the p.Glu159Lys variant is uncertain. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 25, 2024The c.475G>A (p.E159K) alteration is located in exon 6 (coding exon 5) of the MYO6 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 475, causing the glutamic acid (E) at amino acid position 159 to be replaced by a lysine (K). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Meniere disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchCenter for Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, University of California, San DiegoJun 03, 2024- -
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert PanelSep 20, 2018The filtering allele frequency of the p.Glu159Lys variant in the MYO6 gene is 0.7% for Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes in the Genome Aggregation Database (91/10146 with 95%CI), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.31
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.46
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.89
D;.;.;.;D;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
1.1
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.29
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.074
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.0
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
4.2
.;H;H;H;.;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.92
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.9
D;D;D;.;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.91
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;.;D;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0, 1.0
.;D;D;D;.;.
Vest4
0.91
MVP
0.98
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.26
T
GERP RS
5.5
gMVP
0.95

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201507590; hg19: chr6-76542642; API