rs201507590
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the p.Glu159Lys variant in the MYO6 gene is 0.7% for Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes in the Genome Aggregation Database (91/10146 with 95%CI), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA135641/MONDO:0019497/005
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004999.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | NM_004999.4 | c.475G>A | p.Glu159Lys | missense_variant | 6/35 | ENST00000369977.8 | NP_004990.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | ENST00000369977.8 | c.475G>A | p.Glu159Lys | missense_variant | 6/35 | 1 | NM_004999.4 | ENSP00000358994.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152166Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000466 AC: 117AN: 251284Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000479 AC XY: 65AN XY: 135808
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000276 AC: 403AN: 1461088Hom.: 3 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000286 AC XY: 208AN XY: 726922
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152166Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74322
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 10, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Classified as benign by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel (ClinVar SCV000840548.3; PMID: 30311386); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30311386) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 28, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2023 | MYO6: PP3, BS1 - |
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Oct 30, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 29, 2016 | The p.Glu159Lys variant in MYO6 has been identified by our laboratory in 1 indiv idual with hearing loss and in 38/66510 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggreg ation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201507590). Comp utational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong suppo rt for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical significanc e of the p.Glu159Lys variant is uncertain. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 25, 2024 | The c.475G>A (p.E159K) alteration is located in exon 6 (coding exon 5) of the MYO6 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 475, causing the glutamic acid (E) at amino acid position 159 to be replaced by a lysine (K). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Meniere disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Center for Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego | Jun 03, 2024 | - - |
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel | Sep 20, 2018 | The filtering allele frequency of the p.Glu159Lys variant in the MYO6 gene is 0.7% for Ashkenazi Jewish chromosomes in the Genome Aggregation Database (91/10146 with 95%CI), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at