7-105532356-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_021930.6(RINT1):c.41C>T(p.Pro14Leu) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000194 in 1,601,298 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 18/24 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P14R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021930.6 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- infantile liver failure syndrome 3Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- infantile liver failure syndrome 2Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RINT1 | NM_021930.6 | c.41C>T | p.Pro14Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 1 of 15 | ENST00000257700.7 | NP_068749.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RINT1 | ENST00000257700.7 | c.41C>T | p.Pro14Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 1 of 15 | 1 | NM_021930.6 | ENSP00000257700.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152264Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000996 AC: 22AN: 220830 AF XY: 0.000107 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000198 AC: 287AN: 1449034Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000206 AC XY: 148AN XY: 720040 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152264Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74394 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 14 of the RINT1 protein (p.Pro14Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs201898612, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and/or ovarian cancer and melanoma (PMID: 27544226, 31567591). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 410798). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The leucine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at