7-107701928-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):​c.1905G>A​(p.Glu635=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,612,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SLC26A4
NM_000441.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC26A4 (HGNC:8818): (solute carrier family 26 member 4) Mutations in this gene are associated with Pendred syndrome, the most common form of syndromic deafness, an autosomal-recessive disease. It is highly homologous to the SLC26A3 gene; they have similar genomic structures and this gene is located 3' of the SLC26A3 gene. The encoded protein has homology to sulfate transporters. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 7-107701928-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107701928-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 551205.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.45 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SLC26A4NM_000441.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1905G>A p.Glu635= synonymous_variant 17/21 ENST00000644269.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SLC26A4ENST00000644269.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1905G>A p.Glu635= synonymous_variant 17/21 NM_000441.2 P1O43511-1
SLC26A4ENST00000492030.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.192G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/65
SLC26A4ENST00000644846.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.618G>A p.Glu206= synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 7/10
SLC26A4ENST00000480841.5 linkuse as main transcript downstream_gene_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000854
AC:
13
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000111
AC:
28
AN:
251196
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000958
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135756
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00152
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000233
AC:
34
AN:
1460672
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000206
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
726754
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000806
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000854
AC:
13
AN:
152292
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000940
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000688
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000718

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 11, 2021See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 21, 2017- -
Pendred syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 21, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 08, 2021Variant summary: SLC26A4 c.1905G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 251196 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0015 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in SLC26A4 causing Pendred Syndrome (0.00011 vs 0.0035), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1905G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with enlarged vestibular aqueduct/hearing loss without strong evidence for causality (Dai_2008, Yuan_2009, Li_2014, Yuan_2012). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Pendred Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One lab classified the variant as likely benign while two classified the variant as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 17, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
6.7
DANN
Benign
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs541538556; hg19: chr7-107342373; API