rs541538556
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7
The NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.1905G>A(p.Glu635=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,612,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SLC26A4
NM_000441.2 synonymous
NM_000441.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.45
Genes affected
SLC26A4 (HGNC:8818): (solute carrier family 26 member 4) Mutations in this gene are associated with Pendred syndrome, the most common form of syndromic deafness, an autosomal-recessive disease. It is highly homologous to the SLC26A3 gene; they have similar genomic structures and this gene is located 3' of the SLC26A3 gene. The encoded protein has homology to sulfate transporters. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 7-107701928-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107701928-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 551205.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.45 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC26A4 | NM_000441.2 | c.1905G>A | p.Glu635= | synonymous_variant | 17/21 | ENST00000644269.2 | NP_000432.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC26A4 | ENST00000644269.2 | c.1905G>A | p.Glu635= | synonymous_variant | 17/21 | NM_000441.2 | ENSP00000494017 | P1 | ||
SLC26A4 | ENST00000492030.2 | n.192G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/6 | 5 | |||||
SLC26A4 | ENST00000644846.1 | c.618G>A | p.Glu206= | synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 7/10 | ENSP00000494344 | ||||
SLC26A4 | ENST00000480841.5 | downstream_gene_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
152174
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000111 AC: 28AN: 251196Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000958 AC XY: 13AN XY: 135756
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
251196
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135756
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000233 AC: 34AN: 1460672Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 726754
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
1460672
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
726754
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152292Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000940 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
152292
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 21, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 11, 2021 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Pendred syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 21, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 08, 2021 | Variant summary: SLC26A4 c.1905G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 251196 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0015 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in SLC26A4 causing Pendred Syndrome (0.00011 vs 0.0035), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1905G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with enlarged vestibular aqueduct/hearing loss without strong evidence for causality (Dai_2008, Yuan_2009, Li_2014, Yuan_2012). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Pendred Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One lab classified the variant as likely benign while two classified the variant as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 17, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at