7-117592412-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):​c.2245C>T​(p.Leu749Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000743 in 1,613,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.63

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
CFTR Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cystic fibrosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet
  • congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary chronic pancreatitis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 7-117592412-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-117592412-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 256251.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.63 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000492.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CFTR
NM_000492.4
MANE Select
c.2245C>Tp.Leu749Leu
synonymous
Exon 14 of 27NP_000483.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CFTR
ENST00000003084.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.2245C>Tp.Leu749Leu
synonymous
Exon 14 of 27ENSP00000003084.6
CFTR
ENST00000699602.1
c.2245C>Tp.Leu749Leu
synonymous
Exon 14 of 27ENSP00000514471.1
CFTR
ENST00000426809.5
TSL:5
c.2155C>Tp.Leu719Leu
synonymous
Exon 13 of 26ENSP00000389119.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000572
AC:
87
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000611
AC:
153
AN:
250314
AF XY:
0.000643
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000465
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000301
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000658
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000760
AC:
1111
AN:
1461050
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000776
AC XY:
564
AN XY:
726814
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000897
AC:
3
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000403
AC:
18
AN:
44626
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000422
AC:
11
AN:
26048
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86144
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000169
AC:
9
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000930
AC:
1034
AN:
1111590
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000563
AC:
34
AN:
60342
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
67
134
200
267
334
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000571
AC:
87
AN:
152308
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000470
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000192
AC:
8
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000576
AC:
2
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00110
AC:
75
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
11
17
22
28
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000852
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000529
EpiCase
AF:
0.00175
EpiControl
AF:
0.00125

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:5
Apr 20, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The variant affects a conserved nucleotide and results in a synonymous mutation. 5/5 in silico tools predict the variant not to have an impact on splicing while mutation taster predicts the variant to be disease causing. It was predominantly observed in the Non-Finnish European subcohort of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.096% which does not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency of a disease causing CFTR allele (1.3%). It has been reported in patients with wide spectrum of CFTR-related disorders (CF, CBAVD, asthma and COPD) as well as in healthy population and often reported as polymorphism. In one CBAVD patient, this variant was found in cis with R764X (Pallares-Ruiz_1999). In addition, according to Bombieri, it does not lead to exon skipping, suggesting it is indeed not pathogenic. Considering all evidence, the variant was classified as Likely Benign.

Jan 30, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) (PMIDs: 24782259 (2021) and 7689013 (1993)), emphysema (PMID: 9921909 (1998)), and congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) (PMID: 10601093 (1999)). Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant does not affect CFTR mRNA splicing . Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.

Aug 14, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 10, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CFTR: BP4, BP7

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cystic fibrosis Benign:5
Feb 28, 2020
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, BC Children's and BC Women's Hospitals
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 11, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 30, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CFTR-related disorder Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

not specified Benign:1
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Obstructive azoospermia Benign:1
Dec 21, 2021
Institute of Reproductive Genetics, University of Münster
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary pancreatitis Benign:1
Jan 10, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
3.1
DANN
Benign
0.44
PhyloP100
2.6
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs151235408; hg19: chr7-117232466; API